Is there anyone going in WWE today that is more difficult to rate than Dolph Ziggler? Similar to Cesaro in terms of being relegated to dark matches, he’s also been on the other side of the spectrum with a world title win. All three of those guys are phenomenal workers capable of five-star matches, but they don’t have nearly the same clout as Strowman.ĭolph Ziggler (85). Cesaro will be lucky to get on the pre-show, while Strowman has rubbed elbows with the top of the card for the past few months.Īgain, consider all of the wrestlers either tied with or rated better than Braun: Hideo Itami (NXT), Neville (205 Live), and Apollo Crews (only recently starting to get camera time). Continuing my point from Cesaro, you could argue that these two guys’ ratings should be flipped based on the march up to WrestleMania. But based on current WWE programming, that’s a touch too high for the King of Swing.īraun Strowman (78). Now, again, do I think he’s on that level? Without question. His rating here clearly reflects a time when he was more towards the top of the card, as opposed to floundering in an odd pairing with Sheamus that, to be fair, has kept me entertained far longer than I thought it would.īut consider who he’s either tied with or rated higher than: Finn Balor, Randy Orton, Kevin Owens and Bray Wyatt. He’s gone from world title matches all the way to dark matches, and everything in between. That said, the way he’s presented on Raw has varied greatly over the past few years - perhaps greater than any superstar, other than maybe Dolph Ziggler. If I were drawing up the ratings based on my personal biases alone, he would most likely make the top five. His mic work isn’t the strongest, but it’s above average at worst. I would argue he’s one of the best in the ring in WWE today. He happens to be one of my personal favorites to watch today. This segues perfectly into our first example:Ĭesaro (88). To make this as universally applicable as possible, I will primarily consider how the wrestler is currently portrayed on WWE TV, which is a fancy way of saying I am considering not only their ability in the ring and on the mic, but also how strong they look within WWE booking. So let’s first take a look at the WWE 2K17 main roster ratings as it pertains to single competitors. Considering that only Brock Lesnar (95) is rated higher, while two others (Seth Rollins and the Undertaker) are rated the same, I’d argue that, yes, Cena is properly rated. But as wrestling fans well know, there are plenty of Cena haters out there, and some of them might rate Cena in the low 80s out of spite - or even worse, depending on the level of hate.īut, again, the question is not only if Cena’s rating is accurate, but whether he’s properly ranked among the rest of the main roster. So what if we took that same approach to WWE 2K17, with the obvious caveat that not everyone will value each wrestler the same?įor example, I think John Cena at 93 makes a lot of sense relative to what the rest of the roster is rated. It’s fun look at player ratings as we each make independent judgments about their accuracy. So you can play as Simon Gotch, if you wish, just don’t expect to have the same luck against John Cena that you might have against Konnor from the Ascension.Īs a huge fan of the NBA 2K series, one of my favorite things to monitor in the weeks prior to launch is the slow release of ratings info. And although they are not yet at the advanced stage of weekly roster updates, ratings have played a part for the past few years. It should then come as no surprise that WWE 2K has followed this trend. NBA 2K and Madden, for example, promote ratings updates when they are released to users. Even though you could (as I did) argue that WWE 2K is more of a fighting game, it’s typically lumped in with the other sports games, almost all of which focus heavily on ratings. So if you wanted to take on The Undertaker with Spike Dudley, you didn’t feel at a huge disadvantage.īut this has changed in recent years. Wrestlers were not given overall ratings, so character selection was based more on what you were feeling at the time. Wrestling games used to operate the same way. Some might choose Scorpion while others are fans of Liu Kang, but these preferences are based more on what moves, combos and fatalities each fighter has. What do we make of a fighting game that uses player ratings? Die-hard Mortal Kombat fans no doubt have their favorite fighter. You can draw many differences between these and 2K, but the one we are going to focus on today is ratings. Capcom, Tekken, and others are at the forefront. Street Fighter, Mortal Kombat, Marvel vs. When discussing the fighting game genre, WWE 2K isn’t the first series to come to mind for most people. At its core, WWE 2K17 is a fighting game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |